Appeals And Complaints Handling Policy

Jana Nexus: Journal of Health and Medicine

Jana Nexus: Journal of Health and Medicine is committed to handling appeals and complaints in a fair, transparent, timely, and confidential manner. This policy outlines the procedures for authors, reviewers, readers, and other stakeholders to raise concerns related to editorial decisions or publication ethics.

 

  1. Scope of Appeals and Complaints

This policy applies to:

  • Appeals against editorial decisions (rejection, revision, or acceptance conditions)
  • Complaints regarding peer review process or editorial conduct
  • Allegations of ethical misconduct (plagiarism, data fabrication, authorship disputes)
  • Complaints related to publication procedures or ethical standards

 

  1. Appeals Process
  • Authors may submit an appeal within 14 days of receiving an editorial decision.
  • Appeals must be made in writing and include:
    • Manuscript title and ID
    • Clear reasons for the appeal
    • Supporting evidence or clarification
  • Appeals are reviewed by a senior editor or editorial board member not involved in the original decision.
  • The decision after appeal review is final and will be communicated in writing.

 

  1. Complaints Handling Procedure
  • Complaints should be submitted to the Editor-in-Chief with full details and evidence.
  • All complaints are acknowledged within a reasonable timeframe.
  • The journal will conduct an impartial investigation following recognized ethical guidelines.
  • If required, independent reviewers or advisors may be consulted.

 

  1. Confidentiality and Fairness
  • All appeals and complaints are handled confidentially.
  • No individual will be disadvantaged for raising a concern in good faith.
  • Personal data will be protected in accordance with applicable data protection regulations.

 

  1. Ethical Misconduct and Outcomes
  • Proven ethical violations may result in correction, retraction, or other editorial actions.
  • In serious cases, relevant institutions or funding agencies may be notified.
  • The journal will follow established ethical guidance when resolving disputes.

 

  1. Limitations
  • Appeals based solely on disagreement with reviewer opinions, without substantive justification, may not be considered.
  • Complaints related to publication fees or refund requests are governed by the journal’s payment and refund policies.

 

  1. Escalation

If a complainant is dissatisfied with the outcome, the matter may be escalated to the Publisher or Editorial Advisory Board for final review.

 

  1. Policy Review

This policy is reviewed periodically to ensure compliance with evolving best practices in scholarly and medical publishing.